Odds’n’Ends while I work on researching temperature data

Note:  If anyone has a great source for raw temperature data, please post it in the comments section.  Thanks.

From the climate genius Elizabeth Warren–

“What scares me is every time you go back to the scientists, they tell you two things,” the senator said. “It’s worse than we thought, and we have less time.”

Warren is too uneducated and unscientific to see (or too evil to admit she does) this means THE SCIENCE IS WRONG.  If you miss every time, your theory is bad and should be discarded.  I remind people of this all the time.  There is a very, very wrong belief that the theory not predicting cooling is the only proof of a bad theory.  Failure to accurately predict warming—as in “it’s worse than we thought”—is absolutely proof the theory is far from proven or useful.

The kind of climate protest we all would love:

216604_5_

Great photo on American Thinker—apparently from a Twitter thread showing Extinction Rebellion with their heads buried in the sand.  Back in the era of brave and courageous humans, this would have lead to having one’s posterior soundly kicked over and over to illustrate the stupidity of the creature with its head in the sand.  Sadly, I doubt we have the courage to do what is needed.  Sigh.  It does prove they know zip about climate or science.  I guess that’s something….Plus, they’re silent now.  Maybe more protests like this, with photo ops and no speech would be nice.

A word on the wildfires in Australia:

The number one problem is humans—SETTING THE FIRES.  The arson rate for these fires is astronomical.  So when someone says the fires are human caused, agree and state that jailing arsonists might help.  There are articles to the effect that Australia has always had a problem with arson-started fires.  As wide open as the land is, I have no doubt.

When corrected about using climate change without saying “anthropogenic”:

In contemporary vernacular “climate change” has come to mean “catastrophic man made…”

If that’s not your definition, then you are by definition a “denier”.

One of my past slide shows about climate change:

 

The New Year

I plan to look at the more technical and scientific aspects of global warming this year.  Temperature measurement will be first.  There are issues like why use min and max, averages, day versus night warming (and how wind turbines can cause artificial warming if a station is near enough—and yes, it matters—what different statistical approaches yield and why claiming the “right” statistics are applied is displaying a huge lack of understanding of statistics.   Also, scientifically, all data must be preserved and presented, not just adjusted data.  The continual use of adjusted temperatures is not science, it’s propaganda.  Results with adjustments AND unadjusted data should be presented.  Reasons for adjustments should be presented, along with numerous studies and clear explanations of why the adjustments occurred.  Only then can we have real science.

Other topics will include problems with modeling, abusive use of science, why 100% agreement is a cult and not science, responses to typical global warming advocate points, and why “it’s worse than we thought” is an admission the science is still in the very early infantile stage.  If there are other topics of interest, you can comment and I will try to address them.  

These posts take considerable research so progress may be a bite slow.  I try to look at all sides and explain why the points are correct or not.  

img_0024-copy

The official drink of the global warming crew

Myths that harm

Interesting little aside on the Anointed One, Greta.  Seems she may not have been “discovered” on the steps of the assembly but rather those “discovering” her were sent there.  Climate change may have been her way to the spotlight.  More interesting, she is incapable of answering questions extemporarily.  As long as she has a script, she’s great.  Which means she knows not of that which she speaks, but rather parrots the mantra.  A perfect little actress.

Screen Shot 2019-12-24 at 7.12.51 AM

Santa’s reindeer are female:

One more boorish, hateful female lie.   Both female and male CARIBOU (which is NOT what Santa’s reindeer looked like for decades—they were hybrid deer that had no counterpart in reality) have antlers.  Males shed theirs first.  So, if the reindeer have antlers, logically, it seems they are female.  Again, nothing people won’t believe since their IQ’s are lower than the reindeers.  One theory that explains this is like all other animals, the reindeer have not read or adhered to the ridiculous “scientists” ideas of when to shed antlers (most creatures with antlers don’t really care about “experts” and their ideas anyway.)  Thus, the well-fed, males that never breed and live in a happy all-male paradise, have no reason to drop the antlers “on time”.  However, there another great one that sounds more likely:  “Unlike horns, antlers are shed each year. … Some scientists therefore argue that Rudolph, who is universally depicted in late December with intact antlers, is female. In fact, most of the reindeer used to pull sleds are castrated males – they are easier to handle, and have antler cycles similar to those of the females”.   http://www.discoverwildlife.com

Now, the SJW’s should be doing the happy dance over that one.  The reindeer remain male and castrated, exactly as Santa and all males should be (or Santa should be female?).  Forget Christmas, Santa, and all.  Just hate everything male and fun.  It’s the SJW way of life and the Green way of life.  As the Borg say, “resistance is futile”.

Really, people, Santa died years ago in a wind turbine accident involving a blinking red light, a meet with Rudolph and a lot of fog.  So, the actual gender of the reindeer does not matter—they were killed by the Greens anyway.  Same for Santa.

A lying, evil, demonic, horrible propaganda BS commercial about polar bears that are NOT ENDANGERED but liars do not care just came on again for the tenth time today (And yes, I despise these evil liars with a passion.  I’d love to see them walk out and offer kale chips to the bear.  It’s the only way to “fix” stupid.)  My TV may not survive the season.  I turn it off because I live in a country where liars and cheats and morons are everywhere.  If you don’t understand why I am angry at the grinch for giving the gifts back, you’re hopelessly drunk on the koolaid.

PS  We gave Santa a nice burial, and the reindeer, after removing him from the wind plant.  We are not heartless.

(I have been a Grinch since I was 12, so I think it’s not going to change.  It’s what happens when you’re a realist.)

Enjoy your holidays in whatever fashion you choose!  I have no objection to you having fun.   You can have that real tree, all the holiday cheer and meat you want.  Go for it!  I’m not a progressive!!!

A CRUEL AWARD

From my blog climate4kids.blogspot.com:

St. Greta was named “person of the year” by Time magazine.  This is honoring a child that skipped school, and scowls at everyone over something she apparently lacks the intellectual capacity to understand.  She shoves the IPCC document in questioner’s faces and yet appears unable to explain any of the science.  Greta may have read the political part of the report (or not), but I seriously doubt she can even begin to understand any of the hundreds of pages of science studies that are supposed to be the foundation of the report.  Think about this—Greta is rewarded for taking away your childhood, depriving you of your education and bullying people who do not agree with her.  Honestly, she behaves as one that hates humanity, not loves it.  Greta wants your life to be sad, empty and without hope.  She wants you to be uneducated.  She wants you bullying everyone who disagrees with you.  WHY?????  Why would any rational person wish that hell on future generations?  Why would Greta despise you so much she steals your childhood?  Why?

Being honored for bullying and trying to destroy the childhoods of others is what Time magazine is praising.  This is the insanity that the climate change propaganda politicians push.  DON’T FALL FOR IT.  

The world is not in more danger from weather/climate than it ever was.  The climate has not changed significantly in well over a century.  Humans cannot stop hurricanes or tornadoes or blizzards or heatwaves.  What humans can do is adapt and thrive.  So be part of the adaptable human race and don’t cower in fear over a truant child honored for dishonoring the human race. Learn the truth and take back/keep your lives and your futures.

b

Yep, the world seems quite fine!

More science coming!

As noted in a comment on my previous post, I have decided I need to address the issues more and the alarmism less.  I will be taking a hiatus till after the holidays to gather topics and start writing.  If you have any requests, please note them in the comment section.

Have a great Christmas/Holiday/whatever you celebrate (or don’t celebrate)!!

DSCN4739

Scientific Badger

The climate is perfectly normal

This is November 30/December 1 in Wyoming. Lots of snow, lots of wind. Typical for this time of year.

 

Wading through the snow in search of tasty sagebrush!

 

The deer that is closest is snow-covered on back. I have seen this several times in the past.
Bambi-ette (a doe) walked in and scratched out a comfy bed.

 

 

Next is the new symbol for climate change/global warming:

 

 

 

 

Thanksgiving rant

First, I am thankful I live in a country where I can blog and rant.  Happy Thanksgiving

I was listening to an ad on CBD oil pseudoscience and how to get rich off foolish people. The ad says I should go to the SELLER to find out about whether or not the stuff is useful. Seriously, we have lost our minds when we go to the seller for the “facts”? SELLERS SELL. It’s their job description. Not honestly, not honor, not truth—SELL. It’s little wonder people are following morons like Michael Mann and their kids are having nightmares about Waterworld and drinking their own urine while fighting over tomato plants. The very, very LAST person you listen to is the seller, whether it’s a product or a theory. You read studies when claims of benefits are being made—NOT ANECDOTES. You read all sides on politics. You check on BOTH sides of an academic question like Waterworld Earth and the coming death by heat (didn’t the Bible say death by fire? Hmmmmmm.) before you push your kid to suicide or medicate them for depression YOU gave them. IF you’re a rational, intelligent person. Yeah, that’s the catch. People are stupid and emotional. Gypsy wagon fake cures sell at record speed over the internet. I often bet I could have sold dirt in capsules if I called it a natural mineral supplement. It would also work to add food coloring, ground carrots and ground broccoli and call it a superfood.  People are seriously that stupid and apathetic. Slap “sustainable” or “natural” or “organic” on a label and the fools will buy arsenic for dinner. There’s no thought process in this.

There is an ad out there talking about “the little blue planet”. I said something during the commercial about “this is a mattress commercial” and my husband said “What? Mattress?” Yes, and NEVER is the name of the mattress said in the entire commercial. It’s only shown on the last screen. The mattress is “organic wool (I’m itching all over at that—I’m allergic to chemical AND organic wool. Wait, organic wool? The sheep are feed organic, they free-range and they bathe them to keep nasty chemicals off them?), organic cotton (because we LOVE boll weevils destroying cotton crops) and organic latex (sounds kinky, doesn’t it?). Oh, there’s that latex allergy thing—not me, but a whole bunch of people out there. Then they are hand-made in LA (city of feces on the streets). They are “climate neutral”, again an appeal to “THE REALLY STUPID PEOPLE OUT THERE”. Luckily, maybe many people are out of the room and miss the name on the screen or are having flashbacks to pot and the 60’s while the name is displayed.

Worse, there’s a vegan mattress. As another blogger I read says “THE STUPID, IT BURNS”.

Cost for matress:
With 100% natural latex, 100% GOTS organic certified wool & cotton and up to 1,414 support coils and a price of $1,399 for a queen and another $400 for the pillow top option, it’s a great buy. (sleepsherpa.com)
Rich, stupid, mindless fools. Personally, if someone breaks out from the latex and wool, I see lawsuits right and left. I mean, nature is not supposed to hurt you, right?????
Humanity deserves extinction.
Unless Hell freezes over, I’m sticking with my NON-ORGANIC waterbed. I will never, never, never purchase from these idiots and charlatans. They come in right behind class-action Satan minions that sue Monsanto.

Creepy, dishonest, probably-not-someone-to-fly with EasyJet airline will be using creative accounting to pretend they are not producing carbon dioxide emissions. Again, stupid people will fall for this. If only Americans understood language and math-or reality, for that matter.

In other news, Kanye West continues his crusade to destroy what makes Wyoming special by buying a second ranch to pillage. He’s already got bulldozers cutting up the first one for a 70,000 sq foot amphitheater. Who knows what follows? Cody will soon be a rich haven of liberals, much like Jackson. Yes, Kanye likes Trump and for now preaches responsibility, except, of course, his own. HE behaves like he is God, almost literally—while he preaches Christianity, it’s reported he wants to change his name to “Christian Genius Billionaire” (which I hope is not true). If we are looking at who to blame for destroying the planet, check out the millionaires and billionaires. Much like Anschutz in Colorado, they rape and pillage land, while keeping their own thousands of acres beautiful and scenic. I realize this is not fixable. Human greed and stupidity goes back to the beginning of humanity. I was chewed out once for not forcefully opposing this, but honestly, the rich are going to pillage and plunder and no one can fix that. It’s who they are and what they are, from the days of the range wars and railroads, back to the Aztecs and Incas, humans pillage and plunder. They acquire and transform. In the past, humans simply destroyed resources to keep others out. It’s not so blatant as it was in the past, but it’s still there. Bloomberg, Steyer, and their likes destroy to keep themselves rich and everyone else poor. It’s their platform for kingship—oops, presidency. Maybe emperor…..My guess is Kanye will cause a lot of destruction, totally change Cody from a “western town” to a manufacturing and wealthy haven then leave the state. Wyoming loses but you can’t stop this kind of behavior. Wealth is power and the wealthy do not care what they damage or change, as long as THEY feel good about themselves. It’s how humans are. Changing it would be like changing lions to herbivores.

Update: In an amazing show of common sense, Park County denied Kanye the permit for the ampitheater when a request to add residential space was attached. Someone must have realized the likelihood that Kanye intends to build Cody into an area in the image of his dreams while destroying the whole area. We will watch how long this lasts. Kanye was also ordered to stop the dirt work already began, clearing with bulldozers, etc. Now, Kanye can reapply and judging from the idiots in local media, this will happen. Wyoming has the backbone of a jellyfish.

Bernie says we should consider prosecuting fossil fuel companies. Okay, if the morons at the fossil fuel companies don’t shut off all gas and oil immediately and shut this garbage down, the children and grandchildren of today deserve to live in the nightmare coming. Of course, since people are idiots, that won’t happen. Better to let the government parasites slowly kill you than actually take action. I always think of the song “Wishing and Hoping”. Teen age girls can possibly be excused for falling for that drivel, but adults? Nope, it’s hatred for humanity and the hope they can cut and run.

While this is a rant, it’s accurate and necessary. “Head-in-the-sand” is “dead-in-the-sand” and I cannot participate in such idiocy.

 

Happy Global warming!!!
(A representative photo)