Some developments and thoughts

The United States, Torres says, is responsible for “extreme weather events, megadroughts, desertification, deforestation, species extinctions, biodiversity loss, ecological collapse, the spread of infectious diseases, rising sea levels, food supply shortages, mass migrations, social upheaval, and political instability.”
Paul Torres–Salon

Who knew?  The United States apparently has the power of a god.  This is mindless drivel.  Yet somehow people pick it up as the gospel truth.  It is truly frightening how little thought goes into the beliefs of global warming activists.


John Kerry, who voted against the Kyoto Protocol, now says anyone who doesn’t believe in climate change is not qualified to president. Didn’t he mean “Anyone who doesn’t waffle on their positions, voting both for and against an idea” does not deserve to be president? Or maybe it was “Anyone who doesn’t follow what the Washington elite and the very, very, very, very, very rich rulers of this country believe” does not deserve to be president? Maybe he just meant “anyone who disagrees with me does not deserve to be president”. Any way you look at it, it’s all about the politics and nothing about science.


“Saving the environment isn’t just about cutting carbon emissions, of course. Housing the conference cost a small forest. Rather than using existing buildings, the French government built a small city of pavilions at Le Bourget for the conference, seven miles north of the centre of Paris.
A total of 50 contractors worked for 40 days, knocking up 80,000 square metres of temporary buildings and fitting them out.
The centrepiece, a ‘plenary room’ to seat 2,000 delegates, was supposed to be a model of environmentally-friendliness. Yet it alone required 900 trees to be sawn down. The organisers say they have replaced every one with a new tree – overlooking the fact that the new trees are saplings while the 900 sawn down were mature trees. While the delegates were trying to persuade each other to invest in renewable energy, the buildings were heated by a gas-fired boiler. Unbelievably, the organisers said this ‘helps reduce carbon emissions by 20 per cent’ because they could have used an oil boiler, but didn’t.
The Paris Conference made great claims that it would create ‘zero waste’. That was assuming the buildings, to be taken down after the event, could be used again. They might just struggle, though, to find many people in need of a 2,000-seater plenary room.
The organisers said that reusable coffee cups did away with the need for two million disposable plastic cups. Yet reusable cups are not nearly as environmentally friendly as the organisers would have us believe as washing them consumes a lot of energy. According to environmental consultancy Carbon Clear, a ceramic coffee cup would have to be used 354 times before it has used less energy than a plastic cup.”

Read more:

It should be clear to anyone that these people do NOT believe a word they are preaching.  The waste and environmental damage wrought by these conferences is criminal.  No one who actually believed in catastrophic, or even mildly threatening, global warming would behave in this fashion.  This screams “We Don’t Care”.  There is no reason whatsoever to listen to these individuals.  If they don’t believe what they’re preaching, there’s no reason for you do so based on their proclamations.


“Arctic has its warmest year in history as experts say temperatures there are rising TWICE as fast as anywhere else in the world”
Read more:

This is LOCAL warming and is proof of nothing. GLOBAL warming must be global. It is interesting that the IPCC and others worked so hard to eliminate the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age as “local” but I don’t see any rush to point out that the Arctic warming is LOCAL. Why is that?

IF Arctic warming is proof of or caused by global warming, then the Medieval Warm and Little Ice Age are proof that it was globally both warmer and colder in the past, during the time humans lived on the planet. Which means the Hockey Stick and much of what the activists are saying a lie. OR the Arctic is proof of NOTHING and again, the activists are lying.  Either way.

Scientific badger

Scientific badger

Nature that never changes

Nature that never changes TM is the correct term for the global warming movement. In searching for what best describes the alledged goals of the movement, it seems the goal is indeed nature never ever changing. If the average degrees calculated for the planet varies by .05 degrees, the apocalypse is near. If two glaciers melt, they all will and we’re all going to die. If one species goes exitinct, they all will. Nothing can change. EVER. The world must remain in complete stasis. No extinctions, no more, no less storms that last year and the year before. Nor more snow, no less snow. It must all remain the same. Weather change change, so long as the average does not. The average can never change. Winters cannot be warmer, summers colder. The average cannot change.

It’s a win-win for the global warming crowd.  Nature cannot, will not and never has remained constant, especially to the thousanths of a degree.  No matter what humans do, the climate will change, sometimes warmer, sometimes colder, sometimes warming quickly, sometimes cooling quickly.  No matter what happens, nature will not remain static.  Which then “proves” that if humans were not burning fossil fuels, the climate would be stable as it “should” be.  Humans have decided they know exactly what the climate “should” be and are trying to impose that belief on nature.  Problem is, nature doesn’t care.

There exists no scientific solution to global warming, since “solving” it would mean nature never changes.  The only way for that to happen is to build a huge dome and live inside it.  Even then, there may be problems with species dying out, etc.  The belief, however, is perfect for demanding control over every human being on the planet in a vain attempt to make nature what it is not.



Scientific Badger


World abuse, child abuse

The team “Chicken Little” has dumped 300,000 tons of CO2 into the atmosphere to tell everyone to not dump CO2 into the air.  Not very convincing, if you ask me.  Seems unlikely these people wanted anything other than a week in the spotlight and to rip off as much money from the “rich” countries as possible.  Obama just wants to flush America down the drain, not sure on the Pope.  None actually care in the least about the climate or CO2 savings.

Child abuse:

Xiuhtezcatl Tonatiuh, a 15-year-old climate change activist is suing Obama over climate change inaction.  First, the child has no understanding of how the US government works—Obama is not a dictator that can simply say we will close 40% of our industries and starve while China and India pollute away.  Congress is involved and they aren’t as foolish and socialistic as Obama.  They actually checked the science and are not inclined to pay for ruining the economy when even ruining the economy will NOT stop warming even one degree—this according to their own scientists.  Second, I suspect no one told the kid that this is not about climate anyway, but rather wiping out capitalism.  Lastly, the kid is just a tool in the whole political game.  He may one day learn he was nothing more than a pawn, a tool, a thing used by people who really don’t care at all.  He will learn he was lied to and used.  Child abuse.

Then there’s Hallie Turner, the 13-year-old girl who took North Carolina to court over climate change and lost.  Another pawn in a political game where lies and deception are the order of the day.  Of course, young Hallie is not giving up.  Of course she isn’t giving up.  She’s getting tons of publicity, attention and so forth.  That it’s all based on a lie doesn’t matter.  It only matters that “she cares”.  Again, child abuse.  Using a child as a tool, not a human being.