Debunking The “97%” Consensus Claims – Part I

An excellent rebuttal to the constantly quoted “97%”.


By Paul Homewood

Someone mentioned the other day (sorry, forgot who!) that it would be nice to have a simple, go-to piece debunking the “97% of scientists agree” claptrap, which is spewed out by politicians and the media whenever they do not want to discuss facts.

There are essentially two studies which these claims are based around, so I will devote a separate post to each.

The first stems from an analysis in 2008 by Maggie Zimmerman of the University of Illinois.

I can’t do any better than repeat the post by Lawrence Solomon in the Financial Post, which utterly discredits it:

View original post 1,039 more words

Agree? Disagree? Leave a comment!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s