A War No One Really Cares About Winning

There are lawsuits in the against the EPA and its clean coal regulations. There is a fast, easy way to stop all this nonsense in a very short time—shut down ALL coal fired plants NOW. All of them, today. Don’t worry that 40% of the electricity in the USA will be lost—it didn’t matter to the EPA, why should it matter to you? Of course, no one has what it takes to actually stop the nonsense—which makes me question if they even want to. Why are they going through courts when the solution is right in front of them? Perhaps because they don’t really care at all about this and just want to look proactive? That’s the only explanation I have. Coal companies and power companies CAN stop the “war on coal”, but they don’t and they won’t.  Again, ask yourself why.

imadeasign

(A sign I found on the internet—seems appropriate here.  Made a sign, so what more could I do?  We filed a lawsuit—what more could we do?)

 

 

 

Is it weather or is it climate?

“Record Report
Statement as of 12:28 am MST on November 22, 2015

… Record low temperature set at Riverton WY…

Clear skies and fresh snow brought very cold temperatures yesterday
morning. A record low temperature of -4 degrees was set at Riverton
WY yesterday. This breaks the old record of 1 set in 2000. Note the
records for the Riverton site only date back to 1995.

The record low temperature at the cooperative observer site in
Riverton for November 21st is -24 degrees… which was set in 1977.”

Obviously, this is weather.  It’s also a great example of using very limited data (20 years) when proclaiming hottest or coldest.  Climate is generally considered to be calculated in 30 year intervals.  Which interval of 30 years varies.  One would think it would be 30 years back from the day the record was set.  Actually, it’s generally not.  One can also use the average for the 20th century, the average for all years for which we have instrumental records, etc.  Which average is used affects the amount of warming.

The latest example of confusing weather and climate was the December warm weather along the East coast.  The media was publishing pictures of mail carriers in shorts.  It was a very warm December.  Then January came and the blizzard hit.  Suddenly it became very apparent it was a warm December in terms of weather but the climate may or may not have changed.  Snow returned, perhaps just a bit later than last year.  There is, of course, no law in nature that snow must start at the same time each year or fall in the same amount each year.  Natural variability exists.  Yet each time there is warm weather, the media jumps on this a being “global warming” and ignores snow.  Neither a hot summer or a cold winter proves anything except weather is variable.  No matter how many times the media tries to sell the lie, it can never be the truth.

Found this on a climate blog:

“Can you imagine disastrous storms like Hurricane Katrina becoming increasingly frequent and possibly more devastating? What about the entirety of Manhattan being permanently submerged? These are two of many possible outcomes of unchecked global warming, according to Steve Sawyer, a climate policy official at a UN climate change conference.”

The use of the word “imagine” is quite appropriate here.  The quote is 7 years old and hurricanes are at one of the lowest levels in recent decades.  REAL scientists (note the speaker is a “climate policy official, not a scientist) say Manhattan might be submerged in something like 500 years or so IF the upward trend is properly calculated and continues and all of the factors estimated in the models are a close match to actual contributing factors, which is, to put it bluntly, highly unlikely.  It’s all imaginary goblins being sold to people in an attempt to give more money to third world countries for the alleged damage the US has made concerning global warming.  It’s an attempt to stop people from using fossil fuels and having a comfortable life.  It’s an attempt to punish developed countries for their success.  None of the predictions of gloom and doom have materialized.

Weather is just as it always has been—variable throughout the globe and throughout the seasons.  It is not changing any more than it did in the past.  The globe itself may be holding more heat in, but we don’t know why and we don’t know how much.  It’s all speculation with the aid of a computer.

 

What Has Not Been Addressed

“Having the reality of the destructive forces presented by climate change fully register with people, so they will to act with the needed urgency, is indeed a challenge. And, while the physical and environmental effects of global warming are studied and described, what has rarely been addressed, and is as compelling a topic as any, are the psychological impacts.”
National Wildlife Federation

What has not been addressed is the psychological effect of scamming millions of people based on modeling of a phenomena that is not actually occurring in an effort to get people to hand over cash and let their lives be dictated by the elite rulers of the world. What has not been addressed is the the effect of lying and misleading an entire population telling them humans control the weather and if bad weather occurs, it’s only because humans were so evil and bad as to burn the oil and gas they found for heat and electricity. What has not been addressed is the anger and rage that will be felt when blizzards, tornadoes, heat waves and floods increase in spite of people living in dire poverty in a vain effort to control that which they can never control. What has not been addressed is why people were shamed and humiliated, to point of suicide in some cases, for engaging in activities that better their lives. What has not been addressed is how to explain to children that the environmentalists killed all the eagles, bats and eventually drove to near extinction hundreds of species of animals via their lust for renewable, useless sources of energy. What has not been addressed is the landscape carnage left behind by those useless sources of energy, a barren landscape with ghost towers and broken glass panels everywhere, reminders of what damage greed and lack of caring can do to the planet. What has not been addressed is what happens when the reality of the lie of global warming becomes undeniable.

Call me when it’s safe out there.

Some developments and thoughts

The United States, Torres says, is responsible for “extreme weather events, megadroughts, desertification, deforestation, species extinctions, biodiversity loss, ecological collapse, the spread of infectious diseases, rising sea levels, food supply shortages, mass migrations, social upheaval, and political instability.”
Paul Torres–Salon

Who knew?  The United States apparently has the power of a god.  This is mindless drivel.  Yet somehow people pick it up as the gospel truth.  It is truly frightening how little thought goes into the beliefs of global warming activists.

 

John Kerry, who voted against the Kyoto Protocol, now says anyone who doesn’t believe in climate change is not qualified to president. Didn’t he mean “Anyone who doesn’t waffle on their positions, voting both for and against an idea” does not deserve to be president? Or maybe it was “Anyone who doesn’t follow what the Washington elite and the very, very, very, very, very rich rulers of this country believe” does not deserve to be president? Maybe he just meant “anyone who disagrees with me does not deserve to be president”. Any way you look at it, it’s all about the politics and nothing about science.

 

“Saving the environment isn’t just about cutting carbon emissions, of course. Housing the conference cost a small forest. Rather than using existing buildings, the French government built a small city of pavilions at Le Bourget for the conference, seven miles north of the centre of Paris.
A total of 50 contractors worked for 40 days, knocking up 80,000 square metres of temporary buildings and fitting them out.
The centrepiece, a ‘plenary room’ to seat 2,000 delegates, was supposed to be a model of environmentally-friendliness. Yet it alone required 900 trees to be sawn down. The organisers say they have replaced every one with a new tree – overlooking the fact that the new trees are saplings while the 900 sawn down were mature trees. While the delegates were trying to persuade each other to invest in renewable energy, the buildings were heated by a gas-fired boiler. Unbelievably, the organisers said this ‘helps reduce carbon emissions by 20 per cent’ because they could have used an oil boiler, but didn’t.
The Paris Conference made great claims that it would create ‘zero waste’. That was assuming the buildings, to be taken down after the event, could be used again. They might just struggle, though, to find many people in need of a 2,000-seater plenary room.
The organisers said that reusable coffee cups did away with the need for two million disposable plastic cups. Yet reusable cups are not nearly as environmentally friendly as the organisers would have us believe as washing them consumes a lot of energy. According to environmental consultancy Carbon Clear, a ceramic coffee cup would have to be used 354 times before it has used less energy than a plastic cup.”

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3358616/Climate-deal-signals-end-gas-cookers-ll-phased-meet-new-targets-experts-claim.html#ixzz3uaG3efyb

It should be clear to anyone that these people do NOT believe a word they are preaching.  The waste and environmental damage wrought by these conferences is criminal.  No one who actually believed in catastrophic, or even mildly threatening, global warming would behave in this fashion.  This screams “We Don’t Care”.  There is no reason whatsoever to listen to these individuals.  If they don’t believe what they’re preaching, there’s no reason for you do so based on their proclamations.

 

“Arctic has its warmest year in history as experts say temperatures there are rising TWICE as fast as anywhere else in the world”
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3361248/Arctic-posts-record-warmth-land-ice-ocean

This is LOCAL warming and is proof of nothing. GLOBAL warming must be global. It is interesting that the IPCC and others worked so hard to eliminate the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age as “local” but I don’t see any rush to point out that the Arctic warming is LOCAL. Why is that?

IF Arctic warming is proof of or caused by global warming, then the Medieval Warm and Little Ice Age are proof that it was globally both warmer and colder in the past, during the time humans lived on the planet. Which means the Hockey Stick and much of what the activists are saying a lie. OR the Arctic is proof of NOTHING and again, the activists are lying.  Either way.

Scientific badger

Scientific badger

Nature that never changes

Nature that never changes TM is the correct term for the global warming movement. In searching for what best describes the alledged goals of the movement, it seems the goal is indeed nature never ever changing. If the average degrees calculated for the planet varies by .05 degrees, the apocalypse is near. If two glaciers melt, they all will and we’re all going to die. If one species goes exitinct, they all will. Nothing can change. EVER. The world must remain in complete stasis. No extinctions, no more, no less storms that last year and the year before. Nor more snow, no less snow. It must all remain the same. Weather change change, so long as the average does not. The average can never change. Winters cannot be warmer, summers colder. The average cannot change.

It’s a win-win for the global warming crowd.  Nature cannot, will not and never has remained constant, especially to the thousanths of a degree.  No matter what humans do, the climate will change, sometimes warmer, sometimes colder, sometimes warming quickly, sometimes cooling quickly.  No matter what happens, nature will not remain static.  Which then “proves” that if humans were not burning fossil fuels, the climate would be stable as it “should” be.  Humans have decided they know exactly what the climate “should” be and are trying to impose that belief on nature.  Problem is, nature doesn’t care.

There exists no scientific solution to global warming, since “solving” it would mean nature never changes.  The only way for that to happen is to build a huge dome and live inside it.  Even then, there may be problems with species dying out, etc.  The belief, however, is perfect for demanding control over every human being on the planet in a vain attempt to make nature what it is not.

 

img590c

Scientific Badger

 

World abuse, child abuse

The team “Chicken Little” has dumped 300,000 tons of CO2 into the atmosphere to tell everyone to not dump CO2 into the air.  Not very convincing, if you ask me.  Seems unlikely these people wanted anything other than a week in the spotlight and to rip off as much money from the “rich” countries as possible.  Obama just wants to flush America down the drain, not sure on the Pope.  None actually care in the least about the climate or CO2 savings.

Child abuse:

Xiuhtezcatl Tonatiuh, a 15-year-old climate change activist is suing Obama over climate change inaction.  First, the child has no understanding of how the US government works—Obama is not a dictator that can simply say we will close 40% of our industries and starve while China and India pollute away.  Congress is involved and they aren’t as foolish and socialistic as Obama.  They actually checked the science and are not inclined to pay for ruining the economy when even ruining the economy will NOT stop warming even one degree—this according to their own scientists.  Second, I suspect no one told the kid that this is not about climate anyway, but rather wiping out capitalism.  Lastly, the kid is just a tool in the whole political game.  He may one day learn he was nothing more than a pawn, a tool, a thing used by people who really don’t care at all.  He will learn he was lied to and used.  Child abuse.

Then there’s Hallie Turner, the 13-year-old girl who took North Carolina to court over climate change and lost.  Another pawn in a political game where lies and deception are the order of the day.  Of course, young Hallie is not giving up.  Of course she isn’t giving up.  She’s getting tons of publicity, attention and so forth.  That it’s all based on a lie doesn’t matter.  It only matters that “she cares”.  Again, child abuse.  Using a child as a tool, not a human being.

Latest Updates

Today’s updates: (I’ve been very busy and not able to get to blogging as of late. I have disappeared!)

 
From the Sydney Morning Herald—”Australia’s bush fire preparedness under threat as climate change kicks in”
Preparedness for wildfires is not dependent on climate change. It being hot and dry can make fighting the fires more difficult, especially high winds (our landfill managed to burn down 12 houses in high wind—and they are the “authorities” who should have known better). Keeping vegetation cut and aggressively fighting small fires are two of the best ways to avoid wildfires. Yet environmentalist demand underbrush not be cut—it’s as if they want people’s homes to burn down as punishment for some unproven slight against nature. When one wants fire to destroy lives and homes, there’s little anyone can do to control fires, irregardless of the climate or the weather.

(http://www.smh.com.au/environment/australias-bush-fire-preparedness-under-threat-as-climate-change-kicks-in-20151118-gl2382.html#ixzz3sKQtLlV2)

 

Climate change is behind violence in the Middle East: There’s nothing to say here—it is a completely irrational statement and anyone making it should be considered so far out of touch with reality as to be certifiably insane. Weather, climate, nature do not cause wars. Food shortages used to, but in this century, there’s plenty of food. The desire for power is what causes wars. Warlords want territory and to annihilate all who oppose them. Climate has NOTHING to do with it and only idiots say things like that. (Yes, idiot is the only word that fits here. It’s not an insult—it’s an accurate term that is properly used.)
Also, all claims that climate change “caused” this or that are subject to question since there has been no statistically significant warming in the last 18 years. Winters have actually gotten colder and snowier (seems snow is not a thing of the past after all). So global warming cannot be causing this because the globe is not warming.